Yes, this is either configurable at the log source (software writing to this log), within the Gravwell Simple Relay Ingester or a combination of both.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Log Source
Typically, *nix services/software configurations include the ability to limit the syslog logging level (severity) to one of the following:
For example, Corelight@Home has the ability to limit the logging level to a specified severity as documented below:
Simply change the value of the "Corelight::syslog_severity" option found under the "# JSON over TCP syslog export" block in the corelight-softsensor.conf file:
In this case, the Corelight@Home services require a restart to complete this log level change, but now logs up to the newly configured severity will be flowing to Gravwell.
Gravwell Simple Relay
NOTE: Since Priority is a calculated value based upon Facility and Severity, this will change if multiple Facilities are forwarding logs to this listener.
Occasionally, it's not as easily tuned at the source as detailed above so to accomplish similar filtering on the Gravwell side, we'll need to use the regexrouter preprocessor.
First, we need to understand how the Priority is calculated: Priority = (Facility * 8) + Severity
Meaning the 2 bits of information we need are numerical values for facility and severity, but currently we only have their names:
This helpful chart allows us to convert the facility to a numerical value:
and then we can convert "info" to a value using the chart near the top of this page:
Using the Priority equation we should get <134> = (16 * 8) + (6):
So if WARN is the most verbose severity we're after we need to keep events with the following Priority values:
128,129,130,131,132
Now in the gravwell_simple_relay.conf, we need to create a preprocessor to filter for these values:
[Preprocessor "limitSeverity"] Type=regexextract Regex="^(?P<log>\<1(2[89]|3[0-2])\>.*)$" Template="${log}" Drop-Misses=true
This regex string will only match incoming logs with one of the above Priority values while dropping those that do not match thus filtering by
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article